.png)
Prince Harry has been advised to reconsider and be pragmatic rather than playing the victim in his interviews, appearances, and statements against the Firm and his father.
Following his loss in the Appeals Court for security, journalist Stephen Bates has recently shared his thoughts on Prince Harry's BBC interview, which shocked social media.
He wrote an essay for The Guardian in which he criticized the Duke for his failure to recognize his own father's limits in terms of security.
In same interview, Prince Harry stated, "There is a lot of control and ability in my father's hands." Finally, he had the ability to fix the entire situation. No, not necessarily by interfering, but rather by stepping aside and allowing the professionals to do their jobs and carry out an RMB.
According to Mr. Bates, "despite whatever constitutional training he ever received, the fifth in line to the throne does not seem to realise that his dad cannot intervene even in what are technically his own courts to get a favourable outcome for his younger son."
As for "pragmatically, instead of revelling in victimhood," he suggested, "Harry and Meghan might reflect that if they turn up for official events they will get protection."
their "if they turn up privately to stay with friends," presumably "the British public will remain blissfully unaware of their presence or even location."
Nonetheless, "For now, all the palace can do is keep calm and carry on, albeit with exasperation."
"If Harry really wants reconciliation, he could always write a private letter," he said before signing off, "he knows where his father lives."
#princeharry #royalfamily #princeharryinterview #princeharrybbc #bbc #princeharrybbcinterview
