Prince Harry has been publicly chastised for having "burned his bridges" during the BBC interview.
Hilary Fordwich, a British royal scholar, made the complaint and shared it with Fox News Digital.
According to the expert, this is the point of no return, and "King Charles sees his wayward son's approach to detailing private family disputes in interviews, books, and on television as a direct violation of not just royal norms but undignified and contrary to all basic decency."
because "he knows it would be constitutionally inappropriate for him to have intervened directly in any way regarding security," she tweeted.
In terms of King Charles, who many describe as'sentimental', "while he regrets not having a relationship with Archie or [his sister] Lilibet, he is constrained by the legal and constitutional boundaries of his position."
Further, "everyone who knows him says he's loving and generous, so the lack of contact with his grandchildren is said to be hurtful."
The debate, however, did not finish on that note, as Ms Fordwich returned to addressing Prince Harry's behavior and doubled down, calling him "oblivious to the fact that his privileged upbringing was a blessing compared with most."
Before finishing, she responded by adding, "His behavior is causing irreparable harm nationally, as he was once much loved and second in popularity only to his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II." But now it appears that "he doesn't serve his country, he only serves himself." That is incompatible with all British and British principles."
#princeharry #royalfamily #duchessofsussex #princeharrybbc #princeharrybbcinterview #princeharryinterview