Prince Harry has apparently been feeling the 'earth shift as of late' when it comes to his 'open invitations' to Scotland for the yearly vacation.
Daniela Elser, a royal pundit, has referred to insights into the King's shifting relationship with Prince Harry.
She explained everything in one of her essays for News.com.au.
"One of the curious paradoxes of the royal family is that they are worth billions combined, and yet they holiday like a clutch of repressed lay vicars on fixed incomes," she wrote.
"Whether it's tradition, penny-pinching, or just the habit of decades, it's nearly that time of year again, when the House of Windsor flocks to northern Scotland to tramp across moors and endure midge bites for their annual summer 'holiday'."
"Every HRH worth their coronet, and plenty who aren't, are expected to attend, bringing us back to the same stumbling block that royal writers have been asking for five years: what about Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex?"
Ms Elser has termed this inquiry "idiotic" because Prince Harry appears to have already gotten his open invitation.
"However, it is 'certainly not expected' that Harry and Meghan will accept and show up with their children and a matching set of handmade Burberry kilts."
"Even two months ago, the very notion of Harry and Meghan setting foot anywhere north of the Firth of Forth would have been risible," Ms Elser continued, "but it feels like the ground has shifted of late, so it's worth asking the question, could or would they ever take Charles up on a Balmoral stay?"
Because, "if there was ever going to be some sort of royal equivalent of the Treaty of Versailles, the King's private Scottish estate would make a lot of sense for a face-to-face meeting."