.png)
Kate Middleton's attempt to influence her own children's narrative has lately resurfaced, sparking several conversations.
This refers to her choice to take on the job of photographer for her spouse and children.
The reason behind this is said to be an attempt to discourage photographers from intruding private locations or snapping uncomfortable photos of the Windsors.
Her efforts were highlighted in a Channel 5 program titled Kate: A Queen for the Future.
Afua Hagan, a journalist, stated that she feels the reason is as follows: "The Princess of Wales recognizes who she is and her position. She also understands people's interest in her family, particularly her children, and their want to watch them grow up. So she realizes that the press requires these photographs."
Additionally, she has witnessed "through her husband, Prince William, the damage that the press has done to his life and so she's realized that if she can do something about that, if she can take control, then she should do that."
And this approach was "unprecedented at the time," Ms Hagan told The Sun.
meantime, "she decided that she was going to be the one to photograph her own children, which I think was an absolutely brilliant move."
"She has determined that I shall take them and present them to the press agencies. I will be the one to share them on social media."
It is worth noting that the Firm has previously taken significant steps to prevent such unlawful activities from occurring.
Back in 2015, Kensington Palace released a letter warning against such activities, citing the safety of Prince George and his then-3-month-old sister Princess Charlotte as the cause.
At the time, they described their position as follows: "the worry is that it will not always be possible to quickly distinguish between someone taking photos and someone intending to do more immediate harm."
Later, the Metropolitan Police Department stepped in and advocated the same: "Photographers are potentially putting themselves at risk from armed intervention where our armed officers perceive a risk to the personal safety of their principal, the public, and themselves," they stated.
"When assessing potential threats armed officers have to make split second decisions regarding their use of force in order to protect their principals, the public and their colleagues."
